IP360 commissioned Rick to write an article about U.S. design law, which is best described as an awkward patchwork, through the lens of Texas antitrust case, of all things. That case involves traffic barriers and the Texas’ decision to require little V-cuts where the barriers meet. Both the plaintiff and the defendant manufacture traffic barriers. When the plaintiff complied with this requirement, the defendant accused it of infringing its trade dress in those V-cuts. At first blush, this is contradictory because trade dress shouldn’t cover anything that’s functional. The plaintiff suspects the defendant convinced Texas to adopt the V-cuts as a means of gaining a monopoly over traffic barriers in Texas. But the defendant has the First Amendment right to petition government on its side. Read all about it, Trademark Case at the Intersection of Antitrust and Design Law (subscription required).
- There’s Now Less to Hate Hate Hate About That Swift Decision
- Thai Jasmine Rice and Running Shoes: A Tale of Two Trademark Injunctions
- If You Hated Hated Hated That Swift Decision, Walk and Talk Over to This Decision
- You Should Hate Hate Hate This Swift Decision
- Adventures in Drafting: Making Sure You Own the Rights You’re Trying to Enforce
#isitfairuse? #onlinemusicseries Amazon anonymity Apple BitTorrent cases civil procedure consumer consumer-technology disconnect contributory infringement copyright copyright ownership digital content distribution right DMCA expression-idea dichotomy fair use file-sharing First Amendment first sale free speech Google Grooveshark internet licensing market dynamics music Oracle originality parody photography privacy ReDigi safe-harbor secondary liability software statutory damages streaming substantial similarity testimonial trademark trademark registration transformative use Vernor YouTube